Competition and Cooperation in Classroom
Evolution, Cooperation, and Conflict

Cooperation and Competition in Large Classrooms

Author(s): Daniel Brian Krupp, Joseph Kim, Peter Taylor, Pat Barclay
Date: October 23, 2014
Publication Type: Research Report


Instructors of large classes often face challenges with student motivation. The classroom incentive structure – grades, extra credit, and instructor and peer acknowledgement – may shape student motivations to engage in their studies. Over the course of a year, students in the introductory psychology course at McMaster University took part in an experiment to test whether competition could affect student achievement, engagement and peer interaction. Cooperation and Competition in Large Classrooms evaluated the effects of competition on student performance and the learning environment. Over four semesters, students were randomly assigned during their tutorials to various competition conditions: global competition (between tutorials), local competition (within tutorials) and asocial competition (individual); students were rotated through each condition during the experiment. Students competed over weekly tests for bonus credits that could be applied to reweight the final exam in their favour. The authors hypothesized that global competition would make students dedicate greater effort to their studies, perform better on weekly tests and cooperate more with their peers, in turn creating a more positive learning environment.

Key Findings:

Global competition did not have any effect on student performance on weekly tests. The analyses revealed natural variation in test performance and learning environment irrespective of competition conditions. The authors acknowledge that their hypothesis may have been incorrect, although there is substantial literature on the positive effects of global competition on cooperation. The incentives may have also been too small, as the credits would have had at most a 4% effect on the weighting of the final exam. The biggest barrier in the success of the study, say the authors, is likely a breakdown in communication between the researchers and the students. The instructions for the experiment were given to students by their TAs, who often had to be reminded to relay the information to their students. Furthermore, students may not have attended their tutorials, paid attention to or remembered the instructions. In order to understand competition, cooperation and student motivation in large classes the authors propose that future experimental studies consider stronger incentives and address the problem of communication between researchers and students.

Related Publications

Threat of World War


Aaron Clauset Written by Aaron Clauset on September 20, 2017

Since 1945, there have been relatively few large interstate wars, especially compared to the preceding 30 years. The implications of this pattern, sometimes called “the Long Peace,” remain highly controversial. Is this an enduring trend toward peace

Read more
Ecology and Evolution

Causality and the Levels of Selection

Written by Daniel Brian Krupp on March 30, 2016

When is it sensible to say that group selection has shaped organismal design? This question has prompted many replies but few credible solutions. This article provides new work that exposes the causal relationships between phenotypes and fitness.

Read more
Research Duetting as a Collective Behavior

Duetting as a Collective Behavior

Written by Daniel Brian Krupp on February 5, 2016

Mated birds of many species vocalize together, producing duets. Duetting behavior occurs at two levels of organization: the individual level and the pair level.

Read more
Social evolution

Social evolution in the shadow of asymmetrical relatedness

Written by Daniel Brian Krupp, Peter D. Taylor on April 29, 2015

The persistence of altruism and spite remains an enduring problem of social evolution.

Read more
Evolutionary Biology

How to distinguish altruism from spite (and why we should bother)

Written by Daniel Brian Krupp on October 8, 2013

Social behavior is often described as altruistic, spiteful, selfish, or mutually beneficial. These terms are appealing, but it has not always been clear how they are defined and what purpose they serve.

Read more
Terrorism and Political Violence

Organizing for Resistance: How Group Structure Impacts the Character of Violence

Written by Lindsay Heger, Danielle Jung, Wendy H. Wong on November 15, 2012

How does the way in which a group organizes change the lethality of the group's attacks? In this article, we argue that groups organized vertically as hierarchies are likely to conduct more lethal attacks.

Read more