Good Governance

Governance for Peace

Author(s): Conor Seyle
Date: December 12, 2017
Publication Type: Policy Briefs
Research Topics: Good Governance

Overview:

Governance systems that contribute to stable peace are characterized by having inclusive means of operating, participatory systems that bring the governed into the process of decision making, systems for accountability that ensure transparent and equitable operations, and enough systemic capacity that they are able to provide physical security and public goods supporting human development. When all of these elements are present, they form a mutually reinforcing virtuous cycle that reduces the risk of violence.

Key Findings:

  • Governance systems must ensure that all major groups within a polity perceive themselves as included in decisions and equally able to access resources and public goods.  When systems are not inclusive, they contribute to group-based grievances that can lead to mobilization for violence.
  • Participatory governance supports peace.  Governance systems should provide pathways for citizens to feel that their issues and identity is represented in the decision making structure in some way.  When systems are not seen as participatory in some way, their legitimacy is challenged and collective decisions may not be followed. If participation turns into identity-based factionalization leading some groups to feel excluded, then this can contribute to instability.
  • Corrupt and unaccountable institutions can encourage autocratic behavior that contributes to violence.  Systems for accountability that ensure that rules apply equally to all governed citizens contribute to peace. Ensuring transparency about governance decision making processes and distribution of resources is an important part of accountability.
  • A basic level of security and policing is necessary to prevent spoilers and aggressive actors from dominating through brute force.  Governance systems that also provide effective human development – in the form of education, health care, and access to potential economic opportunities – are consistently more peaceful.  When people lack opportunities and are unable to access essential public goods, they are more likely to engage in political violence.
  • These different elements of governance are closely interrelated and support each other.  Where governance is weak or failing, improving only one element of the four identified above is not likely to succeed.  A whole of society approach is needed in which multiple good governance and peacebuilding reforms are addressed simultaneously.
     

Related Publications

New Power Politics

The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance

Written by Deborah Avant, Lindsay Heger on February 12, 2014

The workshop series “The New Power Politics: Networks, Governance, and Global Security” examined how various networks of state and non-state actors work to address the governance of security.

Read more
Global Society

Democratising Transitional Justice: Transitional Trade-offs and Constituting the Demos

Written by Eamon Aloyo on October 2, 2013

Aloyo argues that transitional justice should be democratized so that victims and potential victims constitute the transitional justice demos. To realize this goal he proposes a method by which people can be enfranchised to make such choices.

Read more
Non State actors and Governance

The Rise of Non-State Actors in Global Governance: Opportunities and Limitations

Written by Kelsey Coolidge, Conor Seyle, Thomas G. Weiss on August 17, 2013

The success of non-state actors does not mean that intergovernmental organizations have no role — quite the contrary.

Read more
Burden Sharing Governance

Burden Sharing Multi-level Governance: A Study of the Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia

Written by Conor Seyle, Danielle A. Zach, Jens Vestergaard Madsen on May 26, 2013

The world confronts many threats with transnational dimensions that transcend the the capacity of states to address.

Read more

Governance, Democracy and Peace: How State Capacity and Regime Type Influence the Prospects for War and Peace

Written by Conor Seyle, David Cortright, Kristen Wall on April 26, 2013

This white paper offers a synthetic review of empirical evidence on the elements of state governance that affect interstate and intrastate armed conflict. In the first part of the paper we examine state capacity and institutional quality.

Read more
Criminal Court and Torture

Does the International Criminal Court Deter Torture?

Written by Eamon Aloyo, Yvonne M. Dutton, Lindsay Heger on March 8, 2013

Despite widespread commitment to the international human rights regime, human rights abuses persist and go unpunished.

Read more
Failures in Somalia

Twenty Years of Collapse and Counting: The Cost of Failure in Somalia

Written by John Norris, Bronwyn Bruton on September 19, 2011

This paper explores the staggeringly high costs of the crises response rather than the crises prevention approach by looking at the case of Somalia.

Read more

Pages