Good Governance

Governance for Peace

Author(s): Conor Seyle
Date: December 12, 2017
Publication Type: Policy Briefs
Research Topics: Good Governance


Governance systems that contribute to stable peace are characterized by having inclusive means of operating, participatory systems that bring the governed into the process of decision making, systems for accountability that ensure transparent and equitable operations, and enough systemic capacity that they are able to provide physical security and public goods supporting human development. When all of these elements are present, they form a mutually reinforcing virtuous cycle that reduces the risk of violence.

Key Findings:

  • Governance systems must ensure that all major groups within a polity perceive themselves as included in decisions and equally able to access resources and public goods.  When systems are not inclusive, they contribute to group-based grievances that can lead to mobilization for violence.
  • Participatory governance supports peace.  Governance systems should provide pathways for citizens to feel that their issues and identity is represented in the decision making structure in some way.  When systems are not seen as participatory in some way, their legitimacy is challenged and collective decisions may not be followed. If participation turns into identity-based factionalization leading some groups to feel excluded, then this can contribute to instability.
  • Corrupt and unaccountable institutions can encourage autocratic behavior that contributes to violence.  Systems for accountability that ensure that rules apply equally to all governed citizens contribute to peace. Ensuring transparency about governance decision making processes and distribution of resources is an important part of accountability.
  • A basic level of security and policing is necessary to prevent spoilers and aggressive actors from dominating through brute force.  Governance systems that also provide effective human development – in the form of education, health care, and access to potential economic opportunities – are consistently more peaceful.  When people lack opportunities and are unable to access essential public goods, they are more likely to engage in political violence.
  • These different elements of governance are closely interrelated and support each other.  Where governance is weak or failing, improving only one element of the four identified above is not likely to succeed.  A whole of society approach is needed in which multiple good governance and peacebuilding reforms are addressed simultaneously.

Related Publications

Empirical Trends in Peace

The Century of Peace? Empirical Trends in Peace and Conflict

Written by One Earth Future on November 2, 2015

Is a world without war possible in the 21st century?Trends in armed conflict and a developing body of social scientific research suggest that this idea is plausible.Based on a discussion of high-level experts held in 2014, this report reviews the

Read more
Non-State Actors in Maritime Security Policy Brief

Non-State Actors in Maritime Security

Written by Conor Seyle, Jens Vestergaard Madsen on August 27, 2015

As part of an ongoing lessons-learned project based on Oceans Beyond Piracy’s work with the Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia, OEF Research is documenting the potential role of non-state actors in maritime security.

Read more
Strengthening Maritime Security

Non-State Actors in Maritime Security

Written by Conor Seyle, Jens Vestergaard Madsen on July 20, 2015

Non-state actors have a strong counter-piracy role for the maritime sector, potentially greater than the role they play in land-based problems.

Read more
L. Heger in Journal of Peace Research

Votes and violence: Pursuing terrorism while navigating politics

Written by Lindsay Heger on December 5, 2014

Many of the world’s most infamous terrorist organizations demonstrate clear political aptitude, maintaining highly successful political parties while simultaneously carrying out terrorist attacks.

Read more
A Gap Exists in Research and Implementation

A Gap Exists! (But it is Smaller and More Specific Than You Think)

Written by Chris Cyr, Lindsay Heger on November 7, 2014

In recent decades, many who are involved in international relations and foreign policy have bemoaned the increasing divide between what practitioners do and the issues scholars research.

Read more

Why Govern? The Strategic, Functional, and Normative Logics of Global Governance

Written by Conor Seyle, Amitav Acharya, Blake Berger, Goueun Lee, Kate Tennis on September 28, 2014

Global governance is one of the most critical subjects in international relations scholarship and policymaking today.

Read more
Global Governance Philadelphia

Global Governance: “A Philadelphia Moment”?

Written by Thomas G. Weiss on May 7, 2014

An obvious puzzle for friends and foes of international cooperation is how to explain why order, stability, and predictability exist despite the lack of a central authority to address the planet’s problems.

Read more
Common Framework NGOs Report

A Common Framework for Understanding Non-state Organizations

Written by Danielle Jung, Sarah Stroup, Wendy Wong, Lindsay Heger on May 1, 2014

This paper serves as an introduction to conceptualizations of non-state organizations (NSOs) and, in particular, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), multinational corporations
Read more