Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Brief
Business & Governance

Policy Brief: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Responsibility to Protect

Author(s): One Earth Future
Date: August 27, 2014
Publication Type: Policy Briefs
Research Topics: Business & Governance


An OEF Research report authored by Ken Scott and Laura Rhodes reviewed international and national legal systems, laws, and practices regarding applicable norms and corporate responsibilities related to human rights abuses, and more specifically, mass atrocities. This policy brief is a summary of their research and OEF Research’s recommendations concerning the responsibilities of corporate actors in terms of human rights abuses, violations of international humanitarian law, and mass atrocity crimes.

Key Findings:

Policy recommendations for national, corporate, and civil society organizations:


  • In the absence of a clearer, more effective international legal framework for holding corporations accountable for human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, national governments can implement laws to directly shape their behavior.
  • National laws can be informed by international norms that identify shared responsibilities or limitations on appropriate action.


  • Companies can support existing international treaties and customary law and also participate in the development of international law by incorporating international norms into their own codes of conduct and behavior.

Civil Society Organizations

  • CSOs can increase the efficacy of international norms and national laws by publicizing violations and submitting information to authorities for the investigation, prosecution, or other policing of corporate offenders and their officers, directors, or agents.

International Governmental Organizations

  • By serving as forums where consensus on human rights issues emerges, IGOs can generate international norms related to correct corporate behavior and possible liability, which can in turn provide the foundation for both judicial and non-judicial regulation of corporate behavior.

Related Publications

Implications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Fragile States

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Implications for Fragile States

Written by Victor Odundo Owuor, Sierra Method on February 22, 2019

The fact-sheet is a continuation of the OEFR Business & Governance project’s series on disruptive technologies and fragile states. The global market for unmanned aircraft vehicles (UAVs) or “drones” has grown rapidly in last few years.

Read more

Policy Brief: Diaspora’s Investment in Fragile and Conflict Impacted Economies

Written by Jay Benson, Victor Odundo Owuor on February 12, 2019

Fragile and conflict impacted states often suffer from a severe lack of investment capital for private sector development.

Read more
diaspora investment fragile states

Investing from Abroad

Written by Jay Benson, Victor Odundo Owuor on February 11, 2019

Fragile and conflict impacted states often suffer from a severe lack of investment capital for private sector development.

Read more

Fact Sheet: Understanding SDG 10.C. Global Market on Remittances

Written by Victor Odundo Owuor, Sierra Method on March 19, 2018

This fact sheet seeks to identify successful strategies and reforms that countries have initiated in order to reduce remittance cost - in their effort to comply with Sustainable Development Goal 10C.

Read more

Firm Behavior in Fragile States: The Cases of Somaliland, South Sudan, and Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo

Written by Victor Odundo Owuor on March 29, 2017

This report, based on field research, documents which features of business work in fragile areas and how businesses operate in regard to strategy, contract enforcement, and other aspects of firm behavior.

Read more
Business can support Responsibility to Protect

How Business Can Support the Responsibility to Protect

Written by Conor Seyle on November 29, 2016

A major contribution to the prevention and cessation of mass atrocities was the development of the “Responsibility to Protect” as a formal commitment by United Nations member states.

Read more

The Kenyan private sector's role in mass atrocity prevention, cessation, and recovery

Written by Victor Odundo Owuor, Patrick Obath on November 4, 2016

There are numerous examples of ways in which the business sector has been and continues to be involved in activities that lead to mass atrocity crimes.

Read more
Business and R2P

The Role of Business in the Responsibility to Protect

Written by Conor Seyle, John J. Forrer on November 4, 2016

In 2005 the member states of the UN committed to preventing and stopping the mass atrocity crimes of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.  This commitment was formally called the “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P), and

Read more