Good Governance

Why Govern? The Strategic, Functional, and Normative Logics of Global Governance

Author(s): Conor Seyle, Amitav Acharya, Blake Berger, Goueun Lee, Kate Tennis
Date: September 28, 2014
Publication Type: Conference Report
Research Topics: Good Governance


Global governance is one of the most critical subjects in international relations scholarship and policymaking today. With intensified globalization, and the proliferation of collective action problems the world is facing in diverse areas such as security, climate, and economic relations, the need for the creation and sustenance of legitimate global governance structures is increasingly acknowledged. Yet, while most policymakers think global governance is a good thing, many aspects of global governance are poorly understood and often contested. The spread of global governance structures and institutions remains remarkably uneven across different issue areas; contestations abound over the reform of existing global governance institutions and processes and the creation of new ones. The conference “Why Govern? The Strategic, Functional, and Normative Logics of Global Governance,” held at American University in Washington, D.C. October 3–5, 2013, explored why global governance remains a contested and uneven enterprise. The conference was organized by the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance and the network of the Transnational Challenges and Emerging Nations Dialogue at American University with support from the One Earth Future Foundation of Broomfield, Colorado. 

Key Findings:

  • Demand for global governance can be characterized as strategic (relating to demand for material power), functional (relating to demand for a solution to a specific problem), or normative (relating to normative values that call for global governance.
  • Demand is not consistent across issues or over time. Often, institutions created in response to one type of demand evolve as different pressures arise.
  • Global governance systems have been supported more by materially weak actors than by stronger actors.
  • More data on the subject of demand is needed.
  • The role of creative fragmentation in global governance has significant policy relavance.
  • The study of regionalism may be an important complement to the study of global governance.

The report is also available in Chinese.

View/Download report (Chinese language)

Related Publications

Common Framework NGOs Report

A Common Framework for Understanding Non-state Organizations

Written by Danielle Jung, Sarah Stroup, Wendy Wong, Lindsay Heger on May 1, 2014

This paper serves as an introduction to conceptualizations of non-state organizations (NSOs) and, in particular, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), multinational corporations
Read more
Understanding Governance

Understanding Governance, State of the World 2014 report

Written by Conor Seyle, Matthew Wilburn King on April 29, 2014

"Understanding Governance" is Chapter 2 in the State of the World 2014: Governing for Sustainability by The Worldwatch Institute.

Read more
New Power Politics

The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance

Written by Deborah Avant, Lindsay Heger on February 12, 2014

The workshop series “The New Power Politics: Networks, Governance, and Global Security” examined how various networks of state and non-state actors work to address the governance of security.

Read more
Global Society

Democratising Transitional Justice: Transitional Trade-offs and Constituting the Demos

Written by Eamon Aloyo on October 2, 2013

Aloyo argues that transitional justice should be democratized so that victims and potential victims constitute the transitional justice demos. To realize this goal he proposes a method by which people can be enfranchised to make such choices.

Read more
Non State actors and Governance

The Rise of Non-State Actors in Global Governance: Opportunities and Limitations

Written by Conor Seyle, Thomas G. Weiss, Kelsey Coolidge on August 17, 2013

The success of non-state actors does not mean that intergovernmental organizations have no role — quite the contrary.

Read more
Burden Sharing Governance

Burden Sharing Multi-level Governance: A Study of the Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia

Written by Conor Seyle, Danielle A. Zach, Jens Vestergaard Madsen on May 26, 2013

The world confronts many threats with transnational dimensions that transcend the the capacity of states to address.

Read more

Governance, Democracy and Peace: How State Capacity and Regime Type Influence the Prospects for War and Peace

Written by Conor Seyle, David Cortright, Kristen Wall on April 26, 2013

This white paper offers a synthetic review of empirical evidence on the elements of state governance that affect interstate and intrastate armed conflict. In the first part of the paper we examine state capacity and institutional quality.

Read more
Criminal Court and Torture

Does the International Criminal Court Deter Torture?

Written by Eamon Aloyo, Yvonne M. Dutton, Lindsay Heger on March 8, 2013

Despite widespread commitment to the international human rights regime, human rights abuses persist and go unpunished.

Read more